Full page view
HISTORY

The 15 January 1916 Moving Picture World announced that Tyrone Power had joined Universal at its California studio and was working with Phillips Smalley and Lois Weber on The Illborn, the working title of their eugenics film. Two weeks later, the 29 January 1916 Motion Picture News noted that The Illborn was "rapidly nearing a conclusion." The film retained that title through its editing stage and its initial test screening at the Universal City studio theater, according to the 11 March 1916 Moving Picture World.
       Among exterior locations was an area near Hollywood Boulevard and Cosmo Street in Hollywood, CA, which on 29 September 2021 was officially dedicated by the city as Chaplin-Keaton-Lloyd Alley.
       Universal was committed to screening what it called an important motion picture. On 28 March 1916 it arranged a special New York City screening for major religious leaders and three representatives of the National Board of Review, which had already denounced the film on the grounds that its subject matter "might exert a harmful influence on miscellaneous audiences," the 15 April 1916 Moving Picture World reported. The representatives reacted favorably, and suggested only minor changes that wouldn't "seriously alter the tone and meaning of the photoplay."
       A photo-illustrated, full-page Universal advertisement in the 27 May 1916 Motion Picture News ballyhooed the traffic-stopping mob of people outside the Globe Theatre on New York's Broadway, where Where Are My Children? opened on 10 April 1916.
       By June, state rights sales in California alone had paid for the cost of making the film, the 10 June 1916 Motion Picture News ...

More Less

The 15 January 1916 Moving Picture World announced that Tyrone Power had joined Universal at its California studio and was working with Phillips Smalley and Lois Weber on The Illborn, the working title of their eugenics film. Two weeks later, the 29 January 1916 Motion Picture News noted that The Illborn was "rapidly nearing a conclusion." The film retained that title through its editing stage and its initial test screening at the Universal City studio theater, according to the 11 March 1916 Moving Picture World.
       Among exterior locations was an area near Hollywood Boulevard and Cosmo Street in Hollywood, CA, which on 29 September 2021 was officially dedicated by the city as Chaplin-Keaton-Lloyd Alley.
       Universal was committed to screening what it called an important motion picture. On 28 March 1916 it arranged a special New York City screening for major religious leaders and three representatives of the National Board of Review, which had already denounced the film on the grounds that its subject matter "might exert a harmful influence on miscellaneous audiences," the 15 April 1916 Moving Picture World reported. The representatives reacted favorably, and suggested only minor changes that wouldn't "seriously alter the tone and meaning of the photoplay."
       A photo-illustrated, full-page Universal advertisement in the 27 May 1916 Motion Picture News ballyhooed the traffic-stopping mob of people outside the Globe Theatre on New York's Broadway, where Where Are My Children? opened on 10 April 1916.
       By June, state rights sales in California alone had paid for the cost of making the film, the 10 June 1916 Motion Picture News reported.
       Where Are My Children? faced censorship challenges all around the country. It was not allowed to be shown in Pennsylvania on the grounds that it tended to debase or corrupt morals. According to a 20 April 1916 Moving Picture World review, the trial of a physician for mailing a book that advocated birth control was "plainly indicative of" the Margaret Sanger case of 1915, in which she was indicted for using the U.S. Postal Service to send pleas for birth control. Universal won a case in Brooklyn, NY, in 1916 to show the film after the district attorney brought suit against the theater manager and the Universal Exchange handling New York's state rights sales.
       The 27 May 1916 Moving Picture World mentioned that Lois Weber cast Mary MacLaren in a small role in Where Are My Children? before giving her the lead in Shoes (1916, see entry).
       The copy of this film that was viewed by AFI Catalog "was reconstructed in 2000 from several incomplete American and European release prints," thanks to "the financial support of the Women's Film Preservation Fund of New York Women in Film and Television." A post-production script guided the order of shots and the language on missing inter-titles. The title is listed in existing prints as Where Are My Children, without the question mark, although it is included in copyright records and contemporary reviews. Some ads in late 1916 showing a backlist of Smalley-Weber titles also omitted the question mark.

Less

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS
SOURCE CITATIONS
SOURCE
DATE
PAGE
Motion Picture News
29 Jan 1916
p. 542
Motion Picture News
29 Apr 1916
p. 2558
Motion Picture News
27 May 1916
p. 3252
Motion Picture News
10 Jun 1916
p. 3548
Motion Picture News
7 Oct 1916
p. 2206, 2208
Moving Picture World
15 Jan 1916
p. 445
Moving Picture World
19 Feb 1916
p. 1146, 1200, 1202
Moving Picture World
11 Mar 1916
p. 1668
Moving Picture World
15 Apr 1916
p. 413
Moving Picture World
29 Apr 1916
p. 804
Moving Picture World
3 Jun 1916
p. 1615, 1748-49
Moving Picture World
27 May 1916
---
New York Clipper
6 May 1916
p. 37
NYDM
22 Apr 1916
p. 42
Variety
14 Apr 1916
p. 26
Wid's
20 Apr 1916
p. 524
DETAILS
Alternate Title:
The Illborn
Release Date:
10 April 1916
Production Date:
January 1916
Copyright Info
Claimant
Date
Copyright Number
Universal Film Mfg. Co., Inc.
27 April 1916
LP8170
Physical Properties:
Silent
Black and White
Duration(in mins):
65
Length(in feet):
5,000
Length(in reels):
5
Country:
United States
Language:
English
SYNOPSIS

The souls of unborn children behind the "Portals of Eternity" are of three groups: the army of "chance" children, who go forth to earth "in vast numbers"; the morally or physically defective "unwanted" souls that are constantly "sent back"; and the fine, strong souls that are "approved by the Almighty" and welcomed into the world. District Attorney Richard Walton, who deals with criminals every day, is a believer in eugenics, the idea that crime would be wiped out if man could master the mystery of birth. He grieves because his pampered wife is childless, and dotes on the infant of his sister, who was "contracted [by] an eugenic marriage," and watches longingly the several children who live next door. When a doctor, William Homer, who worked in the slums, is convicted for sending a book through the mail that advocates "birth regulation," Walton is forced to prosecute, even though he personally supports the doctor's contention that society should support only the birth of "wanted" chlldren. After Walton's wife, a social butterfly, takes her friend Mrs. Brandt to Dr. Herman Malfit for an abortion, Mrs. Brandt is again able to attend house parties. Lillian, the Walton's housekeeper's innocent daughter, is seduced by Mrs. Walton's visiting brother. She dies following an abortion performed by Dr. Malfit, and Walton, who learns the truth, throws the brother out of the house and personally prosecutes Dr. Malfit. Sentenced to fifteen years of hard labor, the disgraced physician throws his account book at Walton, who then learns that his wife and her friends have had many abortions. Returning home, where his wife is entertaining her friends, he tells them that he now knows why "so ...

More Less

The souls of unborn children behind the "Portals of Eternity" are of three groups: the army of "chance" children, who go forth to earth "in vast numbers"; the morally or physically defective "unwanted" souls that are constantly "sent back"; and the fine, strong souls that are "approved by the Almighty" and welcomed into the world. District Attorney Richard Walton, who deals with criminals every day, is a believer in eugenics, the idea that crime would be wiped out if man could master the mystery of birth. He grieves because his pampered wife is childless, and dotes on the infant of his sister, who was "contracted [by] an eugenic marriage," and watches longingly the several children who live next door. When a doctor, William Homer, who worked in the slums, is convicted for sending a book through the mail that advocates "birth regulation," Walton is forced to prosecute, even though he personally supports the doctor's contention that society should support only the birth of "wanted" chlldren. After Walton's wife, a social butterfly, takes her friend Mrs. Brandt to Dr. Herman Malfit for an abortion, Mrs. Brandt is again able to attend house parties. Lillian, the Walton's housekeeper's innocent daughter, is seduced by Mrs. Walton's visiting brother. She dies following an abortion performed by Dr. Malfit, and Walton, who learns the truth, throws the brother out of the house and personally prosecutes Dr. Malfit. Sentenced to fifteen years of hard labor, the disgraced physician throws his account book at Walton, who then learns that his wife and her friends have had many abortions. Returning home, where his wife is entertaining her friends, he tells them that he now knows why "so many of you have no children. I should bring you to trial for manslaughter, but I shall content myself with asking you to leave my house." When Mrs. Brandt objects, Walton points to her name in the abortionist's ledger. He then demands of his wife, "Where are my children?" Calling her a murderess, he pushes her away. Mrs. Walton, now repentant, tries to bring about conception, but learns that she can never bear children. Richard Walton is left with growing old, only imagining his children around him.

Less

Legend
Viewed by AFI
Partially Viewed
Offscreen Credit
Name Occurs Before Title
AFI Life Achievement Award

TOP SEARCHES

The Long Haul

Onscreen credits contain the following written acknowlegment: "The producer gratefully acknowleges the assistance and facilities made availabe to the producer by Leyland Motors Limited." Tom Morahan's onscreen credit reads ... >>

The Terminator

A full-page advertisement in the 24 Feb 1984 DV announced the recent start of principal photography, referring to the film by its working title, Terminator. ... >>

That Forsyte Woman

The working title for this film was The Forsyte Saga . According to a pre-release news item in Time magazine, M-G-M decided to change the title ... >>

Pretty Baby

The summary and note for this entry were completed with participation from the AFI Academic Network. Summary and note were written by participant Jeremy Carr, Visiting Research Fellow ... >>

The American Film Institute is grateful to Sir Paul Getty KBE and the Sir Paul Getty KBE Estate for their dedication to the art of the moving image and their support for the AFI Catalog of Feature Films and without whose support AFI would not have been able to achieve this historical landmark in this epic scholarly endeavor.