Full page view
HISTORY

Principal photography began on 12 Nov 1918 at the Fox Film Corp. studios in Hollywood, CA, according to the 14 Nov 1918 Wid’s Daily. The production was referred to by its working title, The Framers. The original story was attributed to Charles Van Dyke, although reviews in the 15 Mar 1919 issues of Motion Picture News and Moving Picture World credited W. S. Van Dyke.
       An item in the 7 Dec 1918 Moving Picture World revealed that the film marked star Gladys Brockwell’s return to the screen following a forced hiatus due to the recent Spanish influenza pandemic. The close of production was announced in the 18 Dec 1918 Wid’s Daily.
       An advertisement in the 22 Feb 1919 Moving Picture World announced the upcoming release by its official title, The Forbidden Room. The 8 Mar 1919 edition noted that the film’s press book featured various articles on the role of women in U.S. politics, including “Woman Voters as Reformers” by Mary Garrett Hay, chairwoman of the Woman Suffrage Party.
       The Forbidden Room opened on 2 Mar 1919, followed by a New York City opening on 13 Mar 1919 at the New York Theatre. Reviews in the 15 Mar 1919 issues of Motion Picture News and Moving Picture World were both highly favorable. ...

More Less

Principal photography began on 12 Nov 1918 at the Fox Film Corp. studios in Hollywood, CA, according to the 14 Nov 1918 Wid’s Daily. The production was referred to by its working title, The Framers. The original story was attributed to Charles Van Dyke, although reviews in the 15 Mar 1919 issues of Motion Picture News and Moving Picture World credited W. S. Van Dyke.
       An item in the 7 Dec 1918 Moving Picture World revealed that the film marked star Gladys Brockwell’s return to the screen following a forced hiatus due to the recent Spanish influenza pandemic. The close of production was announced in the 18 Dec 1918 Wid’s Daily.
       An advertisement in the 22 Feb 1919 Moving Picture World announced the upcoming release by its official title, The Forbidden Room. The 8 Mar 1919 edition noted that the film’s press book featured various articles on the role of women in U.S. politics, including “Woman Voters as Reformers” by Mary Garrett Hay, chairwoman of the Woman Suffrage Party.
       The Forbidden Room opened on 2 Mar 1919, followed by a New York City opening on 13 Mar 1919 at the New York Theatre. Reviews in the 15 Mar 1919 issues of Motion Picture News and Moving Picture World were both highly favorable.

Less

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS
SOURCE CITATIONS
SOURCE
DATE
PAGE
Exhibitors Trade Review
15 Mar 1919
p. 1135
Motion Picture News
30 Nov 1918
p. 3276
Motion Picture News
15 Mar 1919
p. 1702
Moving Picture World
7 Dec 1918
p. 1101
Moving Picture World
22 Feb 1919
p. 1004
Moving Picture World
8 Mar 1919
p. 1371
Moving Picture World
15 Mar 1919
pp. 1524-1525, 1534
Variety
20 Jan 1919
p. 13
Wid's Daily
14 Nov 1918
---
Wid's Daily
18 Dec 1918
p. 3926
Wid's Daily
28 Dec 1918
p. 3926
Wid's Daily
11 Mar 1919
---
DETAILS
Alternate Title:
The Framers
Release Date:
2 March 1919
Premiere Information:
New York opening: 13 Mar 1919
Production Date:
12 Nov--mid Dec 1918
Copyright Info
Claimant
Date
Copyright Number
William Fox
2 March 1919
LP13464
Physical Properties:
Silent
Black and White
Length(in reels):
5
Country:
United States
Language:
English
SYNOPSIS

Ruth Lester resigns as stenographer to the chief of police following her boss’s unwanted advances. She finds employment with District Attorney Anthony Curtis, a reformer who is working to expose the corrupt chief and a crooked contractor named Mason Clark. Anthony falls in love with Ruth and asks her to accompany him in an official capacity on his vacation in the mountains. When Ruth slips while fishing, Curtis catches her and they embrace. As he asks Ruth to marry him, spies for Clark and the chief take photographs, which appear in newspapers as false evidence of a "white slavery" scandal. Anthony fires Ruth, believing she framed him. She takes a job with Clark and lures him to a hotel, where they are arrested under suspicion of adultery. At the ensuing trial, Ruth incriminates herself using false testimony. She meets with Clark during a recess, and promises to tell the truth if he confesses to framing the district attorney. Ruth’s reputation is restored, and she is reunited with ...

More Less

Ruth Lester resigns as stenographer to the chief of police following her boss’s unwanted advances. She finds employment with District Attorney Anthony Curtis, a reformer who is working to expose the corrupt chief and a crooked contractor named Mason Clark. Anthony falls in love with Ruth and asks her to accompany him in an official capacity on his vacation in the mountains. When Ruth slips while fishing, Curtis catches her and they embrace. As he asks Ruth to marry him, spies for Clark and the chief take photographs, which appear in newspapers as false evidence of a "white slavery" scandal. Anthony fires Ruth, believing she framed him. She takes a job with Clark and lures him to a hotel, where they are arrested under suspicion of adultery. At the ensuing trial, Ruth incriminates herself using false testimony. She meets with Clark during a recess, and promises to tell the truth if he confesses to framing the district attorney. Ruth’s reputation is restored, and she is reunited with Anthony.

Less

Legend
Viewed by AFI
Partially Viewed
Offscreen Credit
Name Occurs Before Title
AFI Life Achievement Award

TOP SEARCHES

Mr. Smith Goes to Washington

According to HR news items, "The Gentleman from Montana" (an unpublished story by Lewis R. Foster, alternately called "The Gentleman from Wyoming" by both contemporary and modern ... >>

The Grapes of Wrath

According to materials contained in the Twentieth Century-Fox Records of the Legal Department at the UCLA Theater Arts Library, Fox paid John Steinbeck $70,000 for the rights to his ... >>

The American Film Institute is grateful to Sir Paul Getty KBE and the Sir Paul Getty KBE Estate for their dedication to the art of the moving image and their support for the AFI Catalog of Feature Films and without whose support AFI would not have been able to achieve this historical landmark in this epic scholarly endeavor.