The Intruder (1962)

84 mins | Melodrama | 16 May 1962

Director:

Roger Corman

Producer:

Roger Corman

Cinematographer:

Taylor Byars

Editor:

Ronald Sinclair

Production Company:

The Filmgroup, Inc.
Full page view
HISTORY

The 4 Jan 1960 LAT reported that Roger Corman, president of Filmgroup, Inc., purchased motion picture rights for the 1959 novel by Charles Beaumont, based on a series of recent racial incidents in Clinton, TN. The film would be the first under Corman’s contract with producer Edward Small, for release through United Artists (UA). Two months later, the 13 Mar 1961 DV stated that Corman was embarking on a trip to Tennessee to scout locations, and to meet with exhibitors who advised him to expect little cooperation from Southern states on “a picture dealing with racial integration.” Although only Beaumont received screenwriting credit, the article claimed that he and Corman collaborated. As of 24 May 1961, Corman was seeking locations in Florida, according to that day’s Var, while the 31 May 1961 Var noted that he was having difficulty raising the $200,000 budget. The 16 Jun 1961 DV revealed that the controversial storyline had already lost Corman four financial backers. Undaunted, the filmmaker offered actor Tony Randall a lead role, with hopes of increasing the budget to $500,000, as stated in the 16 Jun 1961 DV. Within days, however, the 19 Jun 1961 DV reported Randall’s rejection of the deal.
       One month later, Corman was on another scouting expedition, this time to Missouri, as noted in the 19 Jul 1961 DV. Principal photography began 31 Jul 1961, according to 4 Aug 1961 DV production charts. The 14 Aug 1961 DV indicated the end of production with star William Shatner’s return ...

More Less

The 4 Jan 1960 LAT reported that Roger Corman, president of Filmgroup, Inc., purchased motion picture rights for the 1959 novel by Charles Beaumont, based on a series of recent racial incidents in Clinton, TN. The film would be the first under Corman’s contract with producer Edward Small, for release through United Artists (UA). Two months later, the 13 Mar 1961 DV stated that Corman was embarking on a trip to Tennessee to scout locations, and to meet with exhibitors who advised him to expect little cooperation from Southern states on “a picture dealing with racial integration.” Although only Beaumont received screenwriting credit, the article claimed that he and Corman collaborated. As of 24 May 1961, Corman was seeking locations in Florida, according to that day’s Var, while the 31 May 1961 Var noted that he was having difficulty raising the $200,000 budget. The 16 Jun 1961 DV revealed that the controversial storyline had already lost Corman four financial backers. Undaunted, the filmmaker offered actor Tony Randall a lead role, with hopes of increasing the budget to $500,000, as stated in the 16 Jun 1961 DV. Within days, however, the 19 Jun 1961 DV reported Randall’s rejection of the deal.
       One month later, Corman was on another scouting expedition, this time to Missouri, as noted in the 19 Jul 1961 DV. Principal photography began 31 Jul 1961, according to 4 Aug 1961 DV production charts. The 14 Aug 1961 DV indicated the end of production with star William Shatner’s return to Los Angeles, CA, the previous day.
       One week later, the 21 Aug 1961 DV reported that, although Corman had a guarantee of cooperation from the Charleston, MO, Chamber of Commerce, he encountered interference from two school-board members, both of whom objected to the film’s depiction of racial integration. Despite arrangements to film in two integrated schools, permission was revoked before Corman could shoot any footage. The delays reportedly added $30,000 to the production budget. The 23 Mar 1963 LAT revealed that the cast and crew had to work quickly, moving “from hamlet to hamlet” as local residents became aware of the picture’s theme. To avoid potential problems with local residents among the cast, Corman distributed screenplay pages pertaining only to the scene being filmed. Regardless, the company needed the assistance of police, firemen, and the National Guard by the end of production. Afterward, Corman and his brother, executive producer Gene Corman, assisted African American actor Charles Barnes in relocating to a Northern state for his own protection.
       On 18 Sep 1961, DV reported that Roger Corman was on his way to Washington, DC, to screen the picture for the National Press Club. Film critic Arthur Knight also hosted screenings in his classes at the University of Southern California (USC), according to the 11 Jan 1962 DV.
       Corman encountered another obstacle when the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) denied its approval because the word “nigger” appeared frequently in the dialogue. The 6 Feb 1962 DV noted that distribution would be limited without MPAA approval, but Corman refused to remove the word because it would reduce the picture’s social impact. Despite endorsements from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights, the MPAA was unlikely to alter its decision. Corman planned to register an appeal. On 15 Feb 1962, the Los Angeles Sentinel defended the MPAA, explaining that the word in question offended and dehumanized African Americans. Three weeks later, the 7 Mar 1962 DV reported that MPAA vice-president Kent Clark screened the film for “a special committee” and reversed the Association’s decision.
       The Intruder opened 16 May 1962 in New York City, and screened that summer at the Venice Film Festival. Critical notices were mixed, although several commended the filmmakers for their courage.
       The 24 Sep 1962 DV reported that, although distributor Pathé-America had gone out of business, Corman was still in debt to the company for publicity expenses. He signed a deal with Mike Ripps of Cinema Distributors of America, who repaid the debt and took over the release. An article in the 19 Dec 1962 Var explained that The Intruder, after failing as a “prestige” film, was being re-released with a “hard-sell” exploitation campaign. While Corman admitted that he preferred “the prestige approach,” the new campaign would enable him to recover his investment and make a profit as well. Corman reportedly financed the nearly $200,000 project with profits from his more successful productions. Although the filmmaker gave Ripps free rein in exploiting the picture, the director’s edit was to remain intact. When questioned as to whether the film might compromise the U.S. image abroad, Corman argued that it would have the opposite effect, as a testament to the free society that allowed it to be made. The 6 Nov 1963 Var announced the picture’s 1964 release under the title, I Hate Your Guts. Some prints were given the title, Shame.
       The 30 Dec 1965 LAT reported the film’s opening the previous week in Los Angeles, on a double bill with Rat Fink (1965, see entry). William Shatner told the 2 Feb 1966 LAT that he was deeply upset over the fate of “the picture he risked his life to make.”
       A news item in the 18 Oct 1961 LAT noted that voice actress June Foray participated in the production.

Less

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS
PERSONAL & COMPANY INDEX CREDITS
HISTORY CREDITS
CREDIT TYPE
CREDIT
Personal note credit:
SOURCE CITATIONS
SOURCE
DATE
PAGE
Daily Variety
16 Feb 1961
p. 3
Daily Variety
13 Mar 1961
p. 2
Daily Variety
16 Jun 1961
p. 3
Daily Variety
19 Jun 1961
p. 3
Daily Variety
19 Jul 1961
p. 2
Daily Variety
21 Jul 1961
p. 26
Daily Variety
4 Aug 1961
p. 7
Daily Variety
14 Aug 1961
p. 2
Daily Variety
21 Aug 1961
p. 1
Daily Variety
18 Sep 1961
p. 2
Daily Variety
11 Jan 1962
p. 8
Daily Variety
6 Feb 1962
p. 1, 4
Daily Variety
20 Feb 1962
p. 1, 4
Daily Variety
7 Mar 1962
p. 1, 22
Daily Variety
15 May 1962
p. 3
Daily Variety
16 Aug 1962
p. 2
Daily Variety
24 Sep 1962
p. 14
Los Angeles Sentinel
15 Feb 1962
Section C, p. 2
Los Angeles Times
4 Jan 1960
Section C, p. 15
Los Angeles Times
18 Oct 1961
Section C, p. 7
Los Angeles Times
30 Dec 1965
Section C, p. 10
Los Angeles Times
2 Feb 1966
Section D, 10
Los Angeles Times
23 Mar 1963
Section A, p. 7
New York Times
21 Feb 1962
p. 54
New York Times
12 May 1962
p. 15
New York Times
14 Mar 1962
p. 35
New York Times
15 May 1962
p. 48
Variety
24 May 1961
p. 15
Variety
31 May 1961
p. 5
Variety
19 Dec 1962
p. 5, 19
Variety
6 Nov 1963
p. 11
DETAILS
Alternate Titles:
I Hate Your Guts
Shame
Release Date:
16 May 1962
Premiere Information:
New York opening: 16 May 1962
Production Date:
31 Jul--mid Aug 1961
Duration(in mins):
84
Country:
United States
Language:
English
SYNOPSIS

Adam Cramer, a member of the reactionary Patrick Henry Society, arrives in a small Southern town to instigate a campaign of hatred designed to arouse white citizens into opposing integration of local schools. Full of surface charm, he ingratiates himself with the townspeople and persuades them to harass black youngsters attending the previously all-white high school; his only articulate opponent is newspaper editor Tom McDaniel, who feels bound to obey the law. Cramer makes an enemy by seducing Vi Griffin while her husband, Sam, a traveling salesman, is out of town; later, when the guilt-ridden Vi runs away, Sam senses that Cramer is responsible. Meanwhile, the town's mood becomes increasingly violent as a black minister is killed by a bomb tossed into his church; in addition, McDaniel loses an eye in a confrontation when he leads black students into school. Cramer then warns McDaniel's teenaged daughter, Ella, that he will kill her father unless she accuses a young black, Joey Green, of attempted rape. The frightened girl agrees, and a lynch-hungry mob lashes the boy to a schoolyard swing; under the prodding of Griffin, however, Ella arrives and publicly confesses her lie. Ashamed and furious at having been deceived, the crowd withdraws, leaving Cramer without ...

More Less

Adam Cramer, a member of the reactionary Patrick Henry Society, arrives in a small Southern town to instigate a campaign of hatred designed to arouse white citizens into opposing integration of local schools. Full of surface charm, he ingratiates himself with the townspeople and persuades them to harass black youngsters attending the previously all-white high school; his only articulate opponent is newspaper editor Tom McDaniel, who feels bound to obey the law. Cramer makes an enemy by seducing Vi Griffin while her husband, Sam, a traveling salesman, is out of town; later, when the guilt-ridden Vi runs away, Sam senses that Cramer is responsible. Meanwhile, the town's mood becomes increasingly violent as a black minister is killed by a bomb tossed into his church; in addition, McDaniel loses an eye in a confrontation when he leads black students into school. Cramer then warns McDaniel's teenaged daughter, Ella, that he will kill her father unless she accuses a young black, Joey Green, of attempted rape. The frightened girl agrees, and a lynch-hungry mob lashes the boy to a schoolyard swing; under the prodding of Griffin, however, Ella arrives and publicly confesses her lie. Ashamed and furious at having been deceived, the crowd withdraws, leaving Cramer without support.

Less

Legend
Viewed by AFI
Partially Viewed
Offscreen Credit
Name Occurs Before Title
AFI Life Achievement Award

TOP SEARCHES

Loophole

This film's working title was Off the Record . A HR production chart adds Don Harvey to the cast but his appearance in the released film ... >>

Pretty Baby

The summary and note for this entry were completed with participation from the AFI Academic Network. Summary and note were written by participant Jeremy Carr, Visiting Research Fellow ... >>

That Forsyte Woman

The working title for this film was The Forsyte Saga . According to a pre-release news item in Time magazine, M-G-M decided to change the title ... >>

East of Eden

An overture precedes the film. The opening title card reads: “John Steinbeck’s East of Eden .” The following written prologue appears after the opening credits: ... >>

The American Film Institute is grateful to Sir Paul Getty KBE and the Sir Paul Getty KBE Estate for their dedication to the art of the moving image and their support for the AFI Catalog of Feature Films and without whose support AFI would not have been able to achieve this historical landmark in this epic scholarly endeavor.