The Outrage (1964)
97 mins | Western | 7 October 1964
Director:
Martin RittWriter:
Michael KaninProducer:
A. Ronald LubinCinematographer:
James Wong HoweEditor:
Frank SantilloProduction Designers:
George W. Davis, Tambi LarsenProduction Company:
KHF ProductionsThe 12 Sep 1963 DV announced that Martin Ritt was in the final stages of negotiation to direct a picture based on Akira Kurosawa’s 1950 film Rashomon, and the 1959 play of the same name by Fay Kanin and Michael Kanin. Ritt’s adaptation was set to be titled The Rape. Paul Newman was already attached to star, and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (M-G-M) would release the film, with a tentative production start date of late Nov or early Dec 1963. Although filming was planned to occur entirely in Hollywood, CA, location shooting was later added. According to the 15 Sep 1963 NYT, Michael Kanin, wrote the screen adaptation, changed the original setting to the American southwest in the 1880s, with Newman playing a Mexican bandit accused of rape.
The 19 Jan 1964 NYT and the 3 Mar 1964 LAT reported that Newman was concerned about performing his first role with a speaking accent, and prepared by spending two weeks in Mexico with the film’s dialect advisor, Walon Green.
The 16 Oct 1963 DV indicated that Ritt was currently on a three-day location scout in Tucson and Phoenix, AZ, accompanied by Kanin, who also served as associate producer, as well as director of photography James Wong Howe, and Paul Newman’s brother, production assistant Arthur Newman.
An advertisement in the 29 Oct 1963 DV listed the film by its release title, The Outrage, and the 6 Nov 1963 DV noted that production would begin the following month. By 20 Nov 1963, the title had been changed to Judgment in the Sun, ...
The 12 Sep 1963 DV announced that Martin Ritt was in the final stages of negotiation to direct a picture based on Akira Kurosawa’s 1950 film Rashomon, and the 1959 play of the same name by Fay Kanin and Michael Kanin. Ritt’s adaptation was set to be titled The Rape. Paul Newman was already attached to star, and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (M-G-M) would release the film, with a tentative production start date of late Nov or early Dec 1963. Although filming was planned to occur entirely in Hollywood, CA, location shooting was later added. According to the 15 Sep 1963 NYT, Michael Kanin, wrote the screen adaptation, changed the original setting to the American southwest in the 1880s, with Newman playing a Mexican bandit accused of rape.
The 19 Jan 1964 NYT and the 3 Mar 1964 LAT reported that Newman was concerned about performing his first role with a speaking accent, and prepared by spending two weeks in Mexico with the film’s dialect advisor, Walon Green.
The 16 Oct 1963 DV indicated that Ritt was currently on a three-day location scout in Tucson and Phoenix, AZ, accompanied by Kanin, who also served as associate producer, as well as director of photography James Wong Howe, and Paul Newman’s brother, production assistant Arthur Newman.
An advertisement in the 29 Oct 1963 DV listed the film by its release title, The Outrage, and the 6 Nov 1963 DV noted that production would begin the following month. By 20 Nov 1963, the title had been changed to Judgment in the Sun, according to that day’s DV.
On 8 Nov 1963, DV reported that 90% of filming would occur at AZ locations, and two weeks of rehearsals were set to begin at the M-G-M Studios in Culver City, CA, on 25 Nov 1963. The 15 Nov 1963 edition announced that filming would occur near Tucson, “without a single ‘cover-set’” to offer protection from inclement weather. The only set to be constructed on sound stages was a railroad station. However, the 2 Dec 1963 DV announced that Ritt had changed plans to shoot for eight weeks in AZ. Instead, filming was scheduled from 9 Dec 1963 to 28 Dec 1963, after which time the production would return to the studio lot, saving $400,000 from a reported $3 million budget.
On 15 Nov 1963 DV announced early objections from Code Administrator Geoffrey Shurlock. Of the forty original complaints filed, however, only “two or three” remained. Receiving a “Code Seal” helped ensure that pictures would not be viewed negatively by the Catholic League of Decency, as indicated in the publication. The 2 Dec 1963 DV stated that Ritt was unconcerned about receiving a Code Seal and planned to retain the film’s rape sequence. Ritt reportedly maintained communication with the Code office, and planned to show them the film for Code approval before its release. By late Aug 1964, Shurlock deemed one line of dialogue to be unacceptable, and Ritt was fighting to keep it in the picture, as indicated in the 25 Aug 1964 DV. The offending line, spoken by actor Laurence Harvey as the “Husband” was as follows: “Don’t dirty the mouth too much with love-making.”
A 20 Dec 1963 DV production chart confirmed the 9 Dec 1963 production start date in AZ. Locations included a ranch sixteen miles north of Tucson. There, a town was built for the trial sequence. According to the 26 Jan 1964 LAT, daily production costs were $35,000. AZ exteriors required full sunlight, and three days of cloudy and rainy weather during the first two weeks of filming had incurred $100,000 in loses. Paul Newman wore a prothetic nose for his character, and two plastic noses were reportedly shipped in from Culver City everyday.
The 31 Dec 1963 DV announced that the crew had returned to Hollywood the day before, following three weeks of location filming.
Again referring to the picture as The Outrage, the 7 Feb 1964 DV noted that exterior filming was currently underway in Chatsworth, CA. Paul Newman was reportedly opposed sound looping, as he felt it compromised performances, so he and sound mixer Larry Jost created “chest mikes with transistors” for the cast to use on location, which eliminated the need for “80 percent” of looping in post production. The 14 Feb 1964 DV announced that two months of outdoor production had been completed, and interiors were set to begin at M-G-M on 17 Feb 1964.
On 16 Apr 1964, LAT stated that the picture was currently being edited.
The 10 Jul 1964 DV anticipated a 16 Oct 1964 opening at the Hollywood Paramount Theatre in Los Angeles, CA. The 13 Aug 1964 edition announced that the New York opening would be held simultaneously at the DeMille and Sutton Theatres on 14 Oct 1964. However, the film opened at the two New York City theaters on 7 Oct 1964, as indicated in the 8 Oct 1964 NYT review.
The Rape
Late in the 19th century a disillusioned preacher, a grizzled prospector, and a cynical con man meet by chance at a southwestern railway station. The first two relate events in the recent trial of Juan Carrasco, the territory's most notorious outlaw, who has been sentenced to death for murdering a southern gentleman and raping his wife. The trial was confusing because three witnesses each told conflicting versions of what had occurred: Carrasco claimed that he bound the husband, forced him to watch the rape, and then killed the husband in a duel; the wife claimed that after Carrasco raped her and fled, she killed her husband in a fit of rage when he accused her of having encouraged the bandit; and an old Indian testified that the husband killed himself because of the humiliation he had suffered. After this last account a cry is heard, and the three men discover an abandoned baby. The con man attempts to steal some gold that has been left for the child, and an ensuing argument reveals that the prospector was also involved in the incident: he had witnessed the crime but did not testify because he had stolen the jeweled dagger from the dying man's chest. The prospector claims that the bandit showed remorse after the rape and begged his victim to come away with him, but fancying herself as a prize to be won, she shamed the two unwilling men into a fight over her, and her husband accidentally fell on the dagger. When the prospector offers to raise the child, even though he has five others at home, the preacher's faith in humanity is somewhat restored, and he is able ...
Late in the 19th century a disillusioned preacher, a grizzled prospector, and a cynical con man meet by chance at a southwestern railway station. The first two relate events in the recent trial of Juan Carrasco, the territory's most notorious outlaw, who has been sentenced to death for murdering a southern gentleman and raping his wife. The trial was confusing because three witnesses each told conflicting versions of what had occurred: Carrasco claimed that he bound the husband, forced him to watch the rape, and then killed the husband in a duel; the wife claimed that after Carrasco raped her and fled, she killed her husband in a fit of rage when he accused her of having encouraged the bandit; and an old Indian testified that the husband killed himself because of the humiliation he had suffered. After this last account a cry is heard, and the three men discover an abandoned baby. The con man attempts to steal some gold that has been left for the child, and an ensuing argument reveals that the prospector was also involved in the incident: he had witnessed the crime but did not testify because he had stolen the jeweled dagger from the dying man's chest. The prospector claims that the bandit showed remorse after the rape and begged his victim to come away with him, but fancying herself as a prize to be won, she shamed the two unwilling men into a fight over her, and her husband accidentally fell on the dagger. When the prospector offers to raise the child, even though he has five others at home, the preacher's faith in humanity is somewhat restored, and he is able to return to his congregation and the Lord's work.
TOP SEARCHES
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
According to HR news items, "The Gentleman from Montana" (an unpublished story by Lewis R. Foster, alternately called "The Gentleman from Wyoming" by both contemporary and modern ... >>
Casablanca
In the onscreen credits, actor S. Z. Sakall's name is incorrectly spelled "S. K. Sakall." HR news items add the following information about the production: ... >>
Gone with the Wind
[Note from the Editors : the following information is based on contemporary news items, feature articles, reviews, interviews, memoranda and corporate records. Information obtained from modern sources is ... >>
Ferris Bueller's Day Off
The picture begins with actor Matthew Broderick, in the role of “Ferris Bueller,” speaking directly to the audience. His commentary continues intermittently throughout the picture.
A 13 Jun ... >>