A Burglar's Mistake (1909)
Melodrama | 25 March 1909
A Burglar's Mistake was filmed in Biograph Co.'s New York City studio.
The 3 Apr 1909 Moving Picture World ran the following review: "The Biograph have achieved another success in this representation of a story that seems to come from real life. A man who is consorting with crooks demands blackmail of an old acquaintance because he remembers a little indiscretion of early youth. He obtains the money and straightway gambles it away. He next undertakes to assist in burglarizing a house which proves to be the residence of the man upon whom he levied the blackmail. He is caught and held up at the muzzle of a revolver. When the master of the house discovers who the burglar is, notwithstanding his plea for life, he shoots him, as he has an undoubted right to do. The acting is quite up to the Biograph's capable standard and the scenes all seem to have some point to them. The question as to whether the master of the house should have shot the burglar is one that must be decided by others. Perhaps it is sufficient here to remark that he certainly had strong provocation.” ...
A Burglar's Mistake was filmed in Biograph Co.'s New York City studio.
The 3 Apr 1909 Moving Picture World ran the following review: "The Biograph have achieved another success in this representation of a story that seems to come from real life. A man who is consorting with crooks demands blackmail of an old acquaintance because he remembers a little indiscretion of early youth. He obtains the money and straightway gambles it away. He next undertakes to assist in burglarizing a house which proves to be the residence of the man upon whom he levied the blackmail. He is caught and held up at the muzzle of a revolver. When the master of the house discovers who the burglar is, notwithstanding his plea for life, he shoots him, as he has an undoubted right to do. The acting is quite up to the Biograph's capable standard and the scenes all seem to have some point to them. The question as to whether the master of the house should have shot the burglar is one that must be decided by others. Perhaps it is sufficient here to remark that he certainly had strong provocation.”
"A thrilling story of an attempt at blackmail. How many of us are wont to look back and wish that we might blot out from our memory the ever recurring specter of the follies of our youth. Such was the experience of Henry J. Newman, a wealthy banker, who, in the flippant Spring of his life was guilty of a slight indiscretion which now in the sober Autumn of his existence seems so iniquitous that he fain would forget it, and above all keep it from knowledge of his family, not that it was enormous, for it was not, as Newman was a man whose standard of morals was high. However, this one false step was known of by Dick Folson, an unconscionable wretch, who, knowing Newman's sensitive nature, sees in the episode an elegant chance for graft, or rather blackmail, which he proceeds to take advantage of. He writes a letter to Newman telling him he has convincing proof of the affair and asking if it is worth to him $300 a month to keep mum. If not, Mrs. Newman will be apprised of all. The letter arrives at a most opportune time to lend success to Folson's design, for Newman is surrounded by his little family, enjoying to the extreme mellifluous domesticity. He goes to his office and sends an answer to Folson saying that his demand is unreasonable and begging him to have pity. Folson writes an answer, but on second thought goes to Newman's office himself and to Newman's entreaties simply replies that it is either $300 a month, the first payment at once, or he will expose him to his wife. Newman at length ...
"A thrilling story of an attempt at blackmail. How many of us are wont to look back and wish that we might blot out from our memory the ever recurring specter of the follies of our youth. Such was the experience of Henry J. Newman, a wealthy banker, who, in the flippant Spring of his life was guilty of a slight indiscretion which now in the sober Autumn of his existence seems so iniquitous that he fain would forget it, and above all keep it from knowledge of his family, not that it was enormous, for it was not, as Newman was a man whose standard of morals was high. However, this one false step was known of by Dick Folson, an unconscionable wretch, who, knowing Newman's sensitive nature, sees in the episode an elegant chance for graft, or rather blackmail, which he proceeds to take advantage of. He writes a letter to Newman telling him he has convincing proof of the affair and asking if it is worth to him $300 a month to keep mum. If not, Mrs. Newman will be apprised of all. The letter arrives at a most opportune time to lend success to Folson's design, for Newman is surrounded by his little family, enjoying to the extreme mellifluous domesticity. He goes to his office and sends an answer to Folson saying that his demand is unreasonable and begging him to have pity. Folson writes an answer, but on second thought goes to Newman's office himself and to Newman's entreaties simply replies that it is either $300 a month, the first payment at once, or he will expose him to his wife. Newman at length yields and Folson goes away satisfied for the month at least. The money does not last long under the strain of Folson's dissipations, and a week later finds him broke again. In this condition he is visited by one of his companions, who is setting out on a burglaring expedition and wants his assistance. In his present frame of mind, he is ready for anything, and so readily consents, not even bothering to inquire where the job is to he pulled off. Arriving at the house they effect an entrance, and get to work gathering in the articles of value. It is not long before they are surprised by someone coming, and start to beat a hasty retreat. One of them gets out, but Folson stumbles and falls and the man of the house is on him, with revolver in hand. Folson scrambles to his feet and finds himself face to face with Newman. For a moment he feels easy, as he assumes he is safe, but the awful reality dawns on him when Newman tells him he can now without compunction put him out of the way forever, for is he not a burglar? And is it not perfectly reasonable for him to shoot him as such? Well, you may be sure that Newman does not let slip this opportunity of assuring himself and his family peace of mind from now on, so when the police carry off the inanimate form of the intruder [sic].”—20 Mar 1909 Moving Picture World
TOP SEARCHES
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
According to HR news items, "The Gentleman from Montana" (an unpublished story by Lewis R. Foster, alternately called "The Gentleman from Wyoming" by both contemporary and modern ... >>
The Grapes of Wrath
According to materials contained in the Twentieth Century-Fox Records of the Legal Department at the UCLA Theater Arts Library, Fox paid John Steinbeck $70,000 for the rights to his ... >>
Casablanca
In the onscreen credits, actor S. Z. Sakall's name is incorrectly spelled "S. K. Sakall." HR news items add the following information about the production: ... >>
Citizen Kane
This film's end credits begin with the statement, “Most of the principal actors in Citizen Kane are new to motion pictures. The Mercury Theatre is proud ... >>