The Fake (1953)

69 mins | Mystery | 25 September 1953

Director:

Godfrey Grayson

Writer:

Patrick Kirwan

Producer:

Steven Pallos

Editor:

Jim Connock

Production Designer:

Denis Wreford

Production Company:

Pax Films, Ltd.
Full page view
HISTORY

The opening credits include the following written acknowledgment: "The Producers wish to record their thanks to the Board of Trustees for their generous permission in allowing them to photograph certain sequences of this film in the Tate Gallery." A 7 May 1952 DV news item reported that Steven Pallos would be producing The Fake for United Artists in London. Correspondence in the film's file in the MPAA/PCA Collection at the AMPAS Library confirms United Artists' pre-production involvement. Pallos and actor Dennis O'Keefe collaborated on a number of British-American co-productions filmed in Britain in the 1950s.
       The Var review of the film's London opening gives the running time as 81 minutes, and copyright records list the the film as 80 minutes long; however, U.S. trade reviews list 69 minutes, which was the duration of the print viewed. Both British and U.S. reviews credit Charles Hasse as editor, but on the print viewed, Jim Connock received the credit. ...

More Less

The opening credits include the following written acknowledgment: "The Producers wish to record their thanks to the Board of Trustees for their generous permission in allowing them to photograph certain sequences of this film in the Tate Gallery." A 7 May 1952 DV news item reported that Steven Pallos would be producing The Fake for United Artists in London. Correspondence in the film's file in the MPAA/PCA Collection at the AMPAS Library confirms United Artists' pre-production involvement. Pallos and actor Dennis O'Keefe collaborated on a number of British-American co-productions filmed in Britain in the 1950s.
       The Var review of the film's London opening gives the running time as 81 minutes, and copyright records list the the film as 80 minutes long; however, U.S. trade reviews list 69 minutes, which was the duration of the print viewed. Both British and U.S. reviews credit Charles Hasse as editor, but on the print viewed, Jim Connock received the credit.

Less

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS
PERSONAL & COMPANY INDEX CREDITS
SOURCE CITATIONS
SOURCE
DATE
PAGE
Box Office
31 Oct 1953
---
Daily Variety
7 May 1952
---
Daily Variety
23 Oct 1953
p. 6
Film Daily
30 Oct 1953
p. 6
Hollywood Reporter
23 Oct 1953
p. 3
Motion Picture Herald Product Digest
31 Oct 1953
p. 2046
Variety
24 Jun 1953
p. 22
Variety
28 Oct 1953
---
CAST
PRODUCTION CREDITS
NAME
PARENT COMPANY
PRODUCTION COMPANY
DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
NAME
CREDITED AS
CREDIT
DIRECTORS
Asst dir
PRODUCERS
Assoc prod
WRITERS
Orig story
PHOTOGRAPHY
Lighting cam
Cam op
ART DIRECTOR
Art dir
FILM EDITORS
MUSIC
Mus adv
Mus arr and cond
SOUND
Sd rec
MAKEUP
Makeup artist
PRODUCTION MISC
Prod mgr
Casting dir
Prod accountant
SOURCES
MUSIC
Music based on Pictures of an Exhibition by Modeste Moussorgsky.
SONGWRITER/COMPOSER
DETAILS
Release Date:
25 September 1953
Premiere Information:
London opening: 5 Jun 1953
Production Date:
late 1952 at Southall Studios, Southall, England
Copyright Info
Claimant
Date
Copyright Number
United Artists Corp.
7 October 1953
LP3091
Physical Properties:
Sound
RCA Sound System
Black and White
Duration(in mins):
69
Countries:
United Kingdom, United States
Language:
English
PCA No:
16687
SYNOPSIS

American Paul Mitchell is assigned by a New York art collector to guard his painting of Leonardo da Vinci’s “Madonna and Child” as it travels to an exhibition at London’s Tate Gallery. After the crate supposedly containing the painting is stolen from the London Docks, insurance investigator Smith, whose company has insured the artwork for a million dollars, reports the theft to gallery director Peter Randall and private collector Sir Richard Aldingham, who has sponsored the special exhibition. However, Paul shows up with the painting and explains that the stolen crate was empty and that the canvas traveled in the ship's safe. Paul is hoping to trace two other da Vincis, which were stolen in Florence and New York and replaced with excellent fakes, and claim a fifty-thousand dollar reward. At a reception for the opening of the exhibit, Paul meets a fellow American, Mary Mason, who works in the gallery’s publications department, and her father Henry, an eccentric, frustrated painter of considerable talent. Paul invites Mary to dinner and later ingratiates himself with her father by commissioning him to paint a portrait of her. In order to understand how galleries can be deceived by forgeries of paintings, Paul talks with a Tate expert who explains the tests used to distinguish fakes from their originals. One night, despite the gallery’s excellent security system, a thief enters, takes the “Madonna” and substitutes a fake. Paul chases the thief over the gallery’s roof, but loses him. The Tate’s expert examines the forgery and states that it is the most perfect he has ever seen. Although Paul is puzzled by the thefts of the da Vincis, which would be impossible to fence ...

More Less

American Paul Mitchell is assigned by a New York art collector to guard his painting of Leonardo da Vinci’s “Madonna and Child” as it travels to an exhibition at London’s Tate Gallery. After the crate supposedly containing the painting is stolen from the London Docks, insurance investigator Smith, whose company has insured the artwork for a million dollars, reports the theft to gallery director Peter Randall and private collector Sir Richard Aldingham, who has sponsored the special exhibition. However, Paul shows up with the painting and explains that the stolen crate was empty and that the canvas traveled in the ship's safe. Paul is hoping to trace two other da Vincis, which were stolen in Florence and New York and replaced with excellent fakes, and claim a fifty-thousand dollar reward. At a reception for the opening of the exhibit, Paul meets a fellow American, Mary Mason, who works in the gallery’s publications department, and her father Henry, an eccentric, frustrated painter of considerable talent. Paul invites Mary to dinner and later ingratiates himself with her father by commissioning him to paint a portrait of her. In order to understand how galleries can be deceived by forgeries of paintings, Paul talks with a Tate expert who explains the tests used to distinguish fakes from their originals. One night, despite the gallery’s excellent security system, a thief enters, takes the “Madonna” and substitutes a fake. Paul chases the thief over the gallery’s roof, but loses him. The Tate’s expert examines the forgery and states that it is the most perfect he has ever seen. Although Paul is puzzled by the thefts of the da Vincis, which would be impossible to fence because they are so well-known, he relentlessly pursues some leads. After discovering that Mason was in Florence and New York around the time the other paintings were stolen, Paul “borrows” one of Mason's originals from Mary and has it analyzed. The expert reports that it contains unique paints, ground in the manner of the old masters. Later, when Paul and Smith find Mason hanged in his studio, Paul suspects that he was murdered. Paul pays a visit to Aldingham’s home to advise him of the latest developments, and after he leaves, Aldingham opens three panels in his study, revealing the stolen paintings. Weston, the thief who stole the artworks at Aldingham's behest, reminds his employer that he is the only person who knows that Aldingham commissioned Mason to make fakes of the originals and that Mason was unaware of their purpose. Weston also warns him that Mary may eventually find out that her father was involved. After Weston rejects Aldingham’s suggestion to kill Mary, Aldingham gives him a poisoned drink that proves fatal. Aldingham then phones the distraught Mary, offers to drive her to his sister’s country place where she can rest, and arranges to pick her up. Meanwhile, as Paul and Smith search for clues at Mason's studio, Paul discovers a rough painting of Aldingham’s study that shows the panels open and the paintings inside. Paul sends Smith to inform the police, then goes to Aldingham’s house where he surprises Aldingham and Mary when they arrive. When Paul confronts Aldingham with the paintings, Aldingham states that they are simply copies he commissioned from Mason. However, when Paul threatens to throw destructive acid on one of the “copies,” Aldingham draws a gun and orders him to back away from the painting. Although Mary knocks the gun out of Aldingham’s hand, Paul still throws the acid, ruining the painting. Paul then explains that the destroyed painting was actually the fake, as he and Randall had earlier switched the paintings. Paul produces the true original, observing that Aldingham fell for his own scheme.

Less

Legend
Viewed by AFI
Partially Viewed
Offscreen Credit
Name Occurs Before Title
AFI Life Achievement Award

TOP SEARCHES

Mr. Smith Goes to Washington

According to HR news items, "The Gentleman from Montana" (an unpublished story by Lewis R. Foster, alternately called "The Gentleman from Wyoming" by both contemporary and modern ... >>

Casablanca

In the onscreen credits, actor S. Z. Sakall's name is incorrectly spelled "S. K. Sakall." HR news items add the following information about the production: ... >>

Gone with the Wind

[Note from the Editors : the following information is based on contemporary news items, feature articles, reviews, interviews, memoranda and corporate records. Information obtained from modern sources is ... >>

Arabian Nights

Arabian Nights opens and closes with a framing story featuring an elderly guardian relating the story of two rival brothers, Haroum-al-Raschid and Kamar al Zaman, to six ... >>

Star Wars

The film’s title card is preceded by the statement: “A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away....” Afterward, a prologue reads: “It is a period of ... >>

The American Film Institute is grateful to Sir Paul Getty KBE and the Sir Paul Getty KBE Estate for their dedication to the art of the moving image and their support for the AFI Catalog of Feature Films and without whose support AFI would not have been able to achieve this historical landmark in this epic scholarly endeavor.