Daniel
(1983)
R | 129 mins | Drama | 26 August 1983
Director:
Sidney LumetWriter:
E. L. DoctorowProducer:
Burtt HarrisCinematographer:
Andrzej BartkowiakEditor:
Peter C. FrankProduction Designer:
Philip RosenbergThe film begins with a close-up of actor Timothy Hutton as “Daniel Isaacson,” performing a monologue about capitol punishment and electrocution. The passage continues intermittently throughout the film. The narrative weaves in between the present-day life of Daniel Isaacson and the past lives of his parents, “Paul” and “Rochelle,” who met as young political revolutionaries in 1940s New York City and were executed in the 1950s for espionage. Daniel and his sister, “Susan” are portrayed as youths in these sequences, which depict their happy childhood at their father’s radio repair shop, their family vacation with a socialist group to a Paul Robeson rally, their parents’ arrest, and their subsequent escape from an orphanage. The picture is framed by newsreel footage of anti-Vietnam War demonstrations.
Although a 17 Oct 1973 HR news item announced that producers David Susskind and Abby Mann had acquired screen rights to E. L. Doctorow’s The Book of Daniel (New York, 1971), with plans for Mann to adapt the novel into a feature film, the project remained in limbo until late Mar 1982, when DV reported that Sidney Lumet optioned a screenplay, written by Doctorow. The deal was announced in a 31 Mar 1982 DV column, which stated that Zanuck/Brown Productions was considering the project. At that time, Lumet was directing The Verdict (1982, see entry) for Zanuck/Brown, but the studio eventually decided against The Book of Daniel. A 1 Jul 1982 NYT article explained that Lumet submitted the property to various studios thirty-three times over a decade, long before Mar 1982, but executives were ...
The film begins with a close-up of actor Timothy Hutton as “Daniel Isaacson,” performing a monologue about capitol punishment and electrocution. The passage continues intermittently throughout the film. The narrative weaves in between the present-day life of Daniel Isaacson and the past lives of his parents, “Paul” and “Rochelle,” who met as young political revolutionaries in 1940s New York City and were executed in the 1950s for espionage. Daniel and his sister, “Susan” are portrayed as youths in these sequences, which depict their happy childhood at their father’s radio repair shop, their family vacation with a socialist group to a Paul Robeson rally, their parents’ arrest, and their subsequent escape from an orphanage. The picture is framed by newsreel footage of anti-Vietnam War demonstrations.
Although a 17 Oct 1973 HR news item announced that producers David Susskind and Abby Mann had acquired screen rights to E. L. Doctorow’s The Book of Daniel (New York, 1971), with plans for Mann to adapt the novel into a feature film, the project remained in limbo until late Mar 1982, when DV reported that Sidney Lumet optioned a screenplay, written by Doctorow. The deal was announced in a 31 Mar 1982 DV column, which stated that Zanuck/Brown Productions was considering the project. At that time, Lumet was directing The Verdict (1982, see entry) for Zanuck/Brown, but the studio eventually decided against The Book of Daniel. A 1 Jul 1982 NYT article explained that Lumet submitted the property to various studios thirty-three times over a decade, long before Mar 1982, but executives were reportedly uncomfortable with its controversial subject. While neither the film nor the novel refer to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg by name, the narrative explores the couple’s 1953 execution for divulging atomic secrets to the Soviet Union, and the impact it might have had on their children. Lumet told the NYT that the Rosenberg story was generally a source of discomfort and “embarrassment” to Americans, and producers were reluctant to invest in a picture that did not have a guaranteed audience.
When The Book of Daniel was on hold, E. L. Doctorow published his first bestseller, Ragtime (New York, 1975), and Lumet directed a series of hit movies, including Dog Day Afternoon (1975, see entry) and Network (1976, see entry), giving them a more viable box-office reputation. In mid-May 1982, entrepreneur John Heyman offered to recruit investors for The Book of Daniel and secured $8.2 million in six weeks. Lumet agreed to work for Directors Guild scale instead of his standard $1.5 million fee, and Doctorow was paid the Writers Guild minimum for his screenplay, as well as an executive producer credit.
On 26 Jun 1982, HR reported that casting was underway, and Mandy Patinkin had recently been hired to costar with Timothy Hutton. One month later, a 28 Jul 1982 HR column stated that filming was set to take place at Astoria Studios in Queens, NY, and a 6 Oct 1982 Var article confirmed that principal photography began on 27 Sep 1982. Shooting was scheduled to continue through mid-Nov 1982, according to a 5 Nov 1982 Backstage news item that referred to the picture by its new title, Daniel.
In the first week of production, a 1 Oct 1982 DV article announced a financing, production, and distribution partnership between John Heyman’s Film Writers Co. and Paramount Pictures. The deal had been in the works for four months, and marked the first enterprise in Paramount’s new “production acquisition” strategy, in which independent film companies financed foreign distribution while Paramount covered domestic release. Although the project was initially developed outside Paramount’s jurisdiction, the studio maintained the same authority as “in-house” productions, with approval rights to script, casting, budget, and packaging.
End credits include: “Portions filmed at Astoria Studios, Astoria, New York,” and, “The producers wish to thank: The Mayor’s Office for Motion Pictures & Television; Trans World Airlines.”
The Night Daniel Died
At a holiday meal, siblings Daniel and Susan Isaacson argue about the legacy of their parents, Paul and Rochelle, who were executed for allegedly leaking atomic secrets to the Soviet Union. Susan, who has emerged from a troubled youth to become a political revolutionary, wants to invest her inheritance in an endowment for the anti-Vietnam War movement called the Isaacson Foundation, but Daniel does not wish to resurrect the controversial family name. A husband and father-to-be, Daniel is not in favor of radical uprising, and believes the world’s problems are best resolved intellectually. Susan is outraged by Daniel’s dismissal of the foundation and accuses the young man of giving their parents a second death sentence by “killing” their endowment. As the siblings become estranged, Susan attempts suicide and is institutionalized, but Daniel argues for her release, insisting that her depression is a result of childhood trauma. When Daniel reunites with Susan at the sanitarium, she warns that the government is still trying to destroy their family and he decides to initiate the Isaacson Foundation, after all. To publicize the budding institution, Daniel meets a journalist who studied his parents’ case and learns about newly declassified documents. The records prove the government used fraudulent evidence against the Isaacsons, but the reporter still believes the couple to be guilty, and warns Daniel against using the foundation to clear the family name. Hoping to uncover the truth, Daniel goes on a quest of self-discovery and becomes more aware of his parents’ political idealism, as well as their involvement in the Communist Party. Daniel’s adoptive father, Robert Lewin, who worked as a young lawyer ...
At a holiday meal, siblings Daniel and Susan Isaacson argue about the legacy of their parents, Paul and Rochelle, who were executed for allegedly leaking atomic secrets to the Soviet Union. Susan, who has emerged from a troubled youth to become a political revolutionary, wants to invest her inheritance in an endowment for the anti-Vietnam War movement called the Isaacson Foundation, but Daniel does not wish to resurrect the controversial family name. A husband and father-to-be, Daniel is not in favor of radical uprising, and believes the world’s problems are best resolved intellectually. Susan is outraged by Daniel’s dismissal of the foundation and accuses the young man of giving their parents a second death sentence by “killing” their endowment. As the siblings become estranged, Susan attempts suicide and is institutionalized, but Daniel argues for her release, insisting that her depression is a result of childhood trauma. When Daniel reunites with Susan at the sanitarium, she warns that the government is still trying to destroy their family and he decides to initiate the Isaacson Foundation, after all. To publicize the budding institution, Daniel meets a journalist who studied his parents’ case and learns about newly declassified documents. The records prove the government used fraudulent evidence against the Isaacsons, but the reporter still believes the couple to be guilty, and warns Daniel against using the foundation to clear the family name. Hoping to uncover the truth, Daniel goes on a quest of self-discovery and becomes more aware of his parents’ political idealism, as well as their involvement in the Communist Party. Daniel’s adoptive father, Robert Lewin, who worked as a young lawyer in the Isaacson defense, explains that the government was eager to scapegoat a common enemy during the Cold War, and the Isaacson case provided a convenient and well-publicized opportunity to display America’s intolerance for Communism. Federal agents forced a confession from the Isaacson’s dentist friend, Selig Mindish, and convicted the couple without real evidence. Believing Mindish holds the true story behind his parents’ case, Daniel travels to Orange County, California, where Mindish’s daughter, Linda, grudgingly takes him to her father’s nursing home. Although the senile gentleman recognizes Daniel, he is unable to speak, and the boy remains unresolved about his parents’ involvement in the conspiracy. However, Daniel is certain that his parents’ devotion to political freedom would have prevented them from betraying their associates. He speculates the Isaacsons may have sacrificed their lives in principle, to protect another couple that was guilty of espionage. With newfound appreciation of his parents’ courage, Daniel reunites with his wife and infant child, but his sister, Susan, is unable to come to terms with the past and succumbs to her mental illness. In the wake of Susan’s death, Daniel honors the Isaacson legacy by marching in mass anti-Vietnam War protests, supporting the ongoing fight for justice, liberty, and world peace.
TOP SEARCHES
The Grapes of Wrath
According to materials contained in the Twentieth Century-Fox Records of the Legal Department at the UCLA Theater Arts Library, Fox paid John Steinbeck $70,000 for the rights to his ... >>
Blue Movie
The 25 Jun 1969 Var review noted that Blue Movie was shot in Sep 1968 in New York City. Along with several other contemporary sources, ... >>
Psycho
Actor Vaughn Taylor's surname is misspelled "Tayler" in the onscreen credits. Several Jun and Jul 1959 HR news items erroneously refer to the film as Psyche. ... >>
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
According to HR news items, "The Gentleman from Montana" (an unpublished story by Lewis R. Foster, alternately called "The Gentleman from Wyoming" by both contemporary and modern ... >>
2001: A Space Odyssey
Opening credits precede a title card that reads: "The Dawn of Man."
In an interview in the 16 Jan 1966 NYT, writer-director-producer Stanley Kubrick discussed ... >>