Fighting to Live (1934)

54 mins | Drama | 8 May 1934

Full page view
HISTORY

No reviews for this film were located. On 21 Jun 1934, the picture was approved for distribution by the New York State Censor Board. Modern source cast credits include Lloyd Ingraham, Henry Hall, John Strohback and Bruce Mitchell. ...

More Less

No reviews for this film were located. On 21 Jun 1934, the picture was approved for distribution by the New York State Censor Board. Modern source cast credits include Lloyd Ingraham, Henry Hall, John Strohback and Bruce Mitchell.

Less

SOURCE CITATIONS
SOURCE
DATE
PAGE
International Photographer
1 May 1934
p. 16
CAST
PRODUCTION CREDITS
NAME
PARENT COMPANY
PRODUCTION COMPANY
DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
NAME
CREDITED AS
CREDIT
DIRECTORS
Doc Joos
Asst dir
PRODUCER
Prod
WRITER
Scr
PHOTOGRAPHY
Frank B. Good
Photog
Asst cam
Chief grip
Warner Bill Crosby
Stil photog
SOUND
Rec eng
DETAILS
Release Date:
8 May 1934
Production Date:
at Mack Sennett Studios
Physical Properties:
Sound
Black and White
Duration(in mins):
54
Length(in feet):
4,949
Length(in reels):
6
Country:
United States
SYNOPSIS

When brutish Joe Gilmore forces his attentions on his father's employee, bookkeeper Mary Carson, Captain, a police dog, attacks him in her defense. Out of spite, Joe decides to "take care" of Captain and his pregnant mate Lady by muzzling them and leaving them to die in the nearby California desert. Soon after, local residents discover that their chickens are being stolen by a wild dog and, during a town meeting, demand that the perpetrator be caught and killed. A posse is formed to apprehend the dog, and a twenty-five dollar reward is offered for his capture. While the posse is scouring the countryside, John Z. Blake, an Eastern-born lawyer who is romancing Mary, falls into a creek while fishing and is knocked unconscious. John is saved from drowning by Captain, but when he tries to pet the dog, Captain runs away and is caught by Joe, who is jealous of John's relationship with Mary. Although the posse is convinced that Captain is the thief, John demands that the dog receive a fair trial. Fearful of John's threats of lawsuits, the townspeople agree to give Captain a trial, and Judge Simmons is brought in to hear the case. The judge and jury are unimpressed by John's legal arguments and are unmoved by his story of Captain's heroics. Before they can claim Captain, however, the dog bolts from the court with John's help. John and his friend, Reb, retrieve Captain at the creek and also discover the still muzzled, starving Lady and her brood of newborn puppies. Back in court, John attempts to justify Captain's thefts by comparing him to a ...

More Less

When brutish Joe Gilmore forces his attentions on his father's employee, bookkeeper Mary Carson, Captain, a police dog, attacks him in her defense. Out of spite, Joe decides to "take care" of Captain and his pregnant mate Lady by muzzling them and leaving them to die in the nearby California desert. Soon after, local residents discover that their chickens are being stolen by a wild dog and, during a town meeting, demand that the perpetrator be caught and killed. A posse is formed to apprehend the dog, and a twenty-five dollar reward is offered for his capture. While the posse is scouring the countryside, John Z. Blake, an Eastern-born lawyer who is romancing Mary, falls into a creek while fishing and is knocked unconscious. John is saved from drowning by Captain, but when he tries to pet the dog, Captain runs away and is caught by Joe, who is jealous of John's relationship with Mary. Although the posse is convinced that Captain is the thief, John demands that the dog receive a fair trial. Fearful of John's threats of lawsuits, the townspeople agree to give Captain a trial, and Judge Simmons is brought in to hear the case. The judge and jury are unimpressed by John's legal arguments and are unmoved by his story of Captain's heroics. Before they can claim Captain, however, the dog bolts from the court with John's help. John and his friend, Reb, retrieve Captain at the creek and also discover the still muzzled, starving Lady and her brood of newborn puppies. Back in court, John attempts to justify Captain's thefts by comparing him to a husband who is desperately trying to save the lives of his starving wife and children. Although the jurors and judge fall in love with the puppies, they still insist that Captain is a dangerous killer. At that moment, however, Mary enters the court and demands that Joe be put on the witness stand. Although Joe denies John's accusations that he abused the dogs and left them to die in an inhumane fashion, Mary demonstrates how Captain attacked Joe for getting too familiar with her and thus establishes that Joe had a motive for wanting the dogs dead. Captain is then vindicated, and John and Mary continue their romance.

Less

GENRE
Genre:
Sub-genre:
Animal


Subject

Legend
Viewed by AFI
Partially Viewed
Offscreen Credit
Name Occurs Before Title
AFI Life Achievement Award

TOP SEARCHES

Blue Movie

The 25 Jun 1969 Var review noted that Blue Movie was shot in Sep 1968 in New York City. Along with several other contemporary sources, ... >>

Psycho

Actor Vaughn Taylor's surname is misspelled "Tayler" in the onscreen credits. Several Jun and Jul 1959 HR news items erroneously refer to the film as Psyche. ... >>

Harold and Maude

During the opening credits for the film, Bud Cort, as the character "Harold Chasen," sets the stage for a mock suicide. As director Hal Ashby's credit appears, Harold jumps ... >>

2001: A Space Odyssey

Opening credits precede a title card that reads: "The Dawn of Man."
       In an interview in the 16 Jan 1966 NYT, writer-director-producer Stanley Kubrick discussed ... >>

The Best Years of Our Lives

The working titles of the film were Glory for Me and Home Again . In the opening credits, actor Fredric March's name is spelled correctly, but ... >>

The American Film Institute is grateful to Sir Paul Getty KBE and the Sir Paul Getty KBE Estate for their dedication to the art of the moving image and their support for the AFI Catalog of Feature Films and without whose support AFI would not have been able to achieve this historical landmark in this epic scholarly endeavor.